mailing list archives
Re: Circuit numbering scheme - best practice?
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:41 -0800
----- jay () west net wrote: ------
thing and horrendously long circuit numbers including CLLI codes such as
That is what's used by the transport section (I'm in the IP section) in the company where I work. Even though the
description is long, I use the entire CID from the carrier along with something that makes sense to me and the NOC folk
that'll be troubleshooting before I get to it. Long in information many times means more work done by the first level
Here's a couple of examples:
"LAG 29 LINK 1 for CKT ID: 101/GE1/HNLLHIMN37W/HNLLHIMN53W"
"101/GE1/HNLLHIMN37W/HNLLHIMN44W to Cisco 3750 7th floor data center"
"OC-12 POS line to AT&T: CIDs-> HT: 82.ODGS.xxxxxx.HAWT AT&T: IVEC.xxxxxx..ATI"
Long? Yes. Helpful to the first level NOC folks? Yes.