Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Are we really this helpless? (Re: isprime DOS in progress)
From: Martin Hannigan <martin () theicelandguy com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:34:59 -0500

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc org> wrote:


In message <8C5F1FEC-FF51-4BA2-A762-C13BC275E806 () virtualized org>, David
Conrad writes:
It would seem that as ISPs implement DPI and protocol-specific traffic
shaping, they damage the arguments that they can make claiming they
have "common carrier" status with the inherent immunities that status
provides.  I can hear the argument now: if an ISP can throttle
BitTorrent (or whatever) for specific nodes, why can't they also limit
the source addresses of packets coming from those nodes?

        They can and should.  I suspect many of them do as they
       usually apply these filters to home networks.

       BCP 38 is ~10 years old now.  It should have been factored
       into the purchasing decision of all the current equipement.
       If it wasn't then the operator was negligent.

       Mark


BCP 38 isn't a license, it's a technique.



-- 
Martin Hannigan                               martin () theicelandguy com
p: +16178216079


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]