Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1/8 and 27/8 allocated to APNIC
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:03:56 +0000

On 22/01/2010 13:54, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Also, 27/8 is clearly in the middle of a group of North American military
assignments.  So at the very least, these aren't very CIDR'ish.

Is that operationally relevant to the /8 assignment process?

Why not 36 & 37?

Random selection to ensure that no RIR can accuse IANA of bias.  See
David's previous post:

http://blog.icann.org/2009/09/selecting-which-8-to-allocate-to-an-rir/

Nick


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]