Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:08:05 -0500

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mathias Seiler
<mathias.seiler () mironet ch> wrote:

In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like to know what is your experience with IPv6 in this 

I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link between two routers. This works great but 
when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong.

So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)



why not just ping your vendors to support this, and perhaps chime in
on v6ops about wanting to do something sane with ptp link addressing?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]