Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:29:21 +1300


On 24/01/2010, at 5:28 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

In a message written on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:52:21PM +0100, Mathias Seiler wrote:
I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link between two routers. This works great 
but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong.

So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)

I have used /126's, /127's, and others, based on peers preference.

I personally have a fondness for /112's, as it gives you more than
2 addresses, and a DNS bit boundary.

For all the pontification about how there are enough /64's to number
all the grains of sand, or other nonsense, I think that ignores too
much operational information.

rDNS is important, and becomes harder in IPv6.  Making it easier
is importnat.

Having a scan of a /64 fill your P2P T1 is poor design, all because
you assigned 2^64 addresses to a link that will never have more
than 2 functional devices.

Most importantly, we should not let any vendor code any of these
into software or silicon, in case we need to change later.

I too prefer /112s. I can take the first /64 in any assignment or allocation and set it aside for networking 
infrastructure.
The first /112 is for loopbacks, the remaining /112s are for linknets.

Then I can filter this /64 at my border, and it's easy.

You can do the same thing with /64 linknets, but then you have to set aside a block of them, and that might get hard if 
you have a /48 or something. Maybe not. What if you have a /56?

Maybe there is some value in linknets being effectively disposable so you never have to worry about problems coming 
from re-use. A single /64 full of /112s gives you 281 trillion.

For links to customers and other networks, I like /64s, because they are right now the standard so you're not going to 
run in to compatibility problems. If you've got links to customers you should have a /32, so setting aside a /48 or a 
/44 or something for those customer links is no huge drama.

--
Nathan Ward

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault