|
nanog
mailing list archives
Re: OpenFlow
From: tammy-lists () wiztech biz
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:38:04 +0000
It could be because his dumb ass got the banhammer from nanog
Mods: can you pleeeease get rid of him again?
Tammy
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:30:55
To: Matlock, Kenneth L<MatlockK () exempla org>
Cc: <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: OpenFlow
On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your spam,
and forget to remove your .sig
Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software
package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the opposite!)
And also, there is a nice agenda item at NANOG50;
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/abstracts.php?pt=MTY2OSZuYW5vZzUw&nm=nanog50
8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
Track: Open Flow
Nick McKeown, Stanford University; Matt Davy, Indiana University
Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM
Abstract:
OpenFlow: An Update
[..]
OpenFlow Trials and Deployments
----------------------------------------------------------------->8
Thus as it is a NANOG-ish topic, I wonder why somebody needs to hide.
Greets,
Jeroen
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: OpenFlow Brielle Bruns (Sep 24)
|