Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:28:55 -0400

I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner
<streiner () cluebyfour org>wrote:

On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:

 I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
155.229.10.20:1024-2047.  Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP.   :)


Would the end-user get both the TCP and UDP ports from their assigned
range?  Also, how would you handle ICMP/ESP/etc... or would those be 'free
with the purchase of..."?

jms




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]