Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:39:03 -0400

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:35, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:

That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the

Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now.  rfc6214 gives us a
brown M&M to put into the contracts...

You need to specify "tail drop" behavior.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]