mailing list archives
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:56:47 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is
that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the
Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us
a new brown M&M to put into the contracts...
I wonder what NYC paramedic David Roth would think, to find out that
he'd coined a bit of technical jargon, quite by accident.
Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
Re: v6 Avian Carriers? GP Wooden (Apr 01)
Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)
Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Brandon Ross (Apr 01)
Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Andy Davidson (Apr 01)
Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Richard Barnes (Apr 01)
Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dave Edelman (Apr 01)