Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:56:47 -0400 (EDT)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/

That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is
funny
that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the
contrary.

Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us
a new brown M&M to put into the contracts...

I wonder what NYC paramedic David Roth would think, to find out that
he'd coined a bit of technical jargon, quite by accident.

Cheers,
-- jra


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]