mailing list archives
Re: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
From: Tom Limoncelli <tal () whatexit org>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:13:42 -0400
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
There is no need for NAT in order to multiple-home. BGP is every bit as effective and much simpler.
I know a lot of small businesses with one FiOS link and one Comcast
link and I don't think they're going to be able to do BGP. Their
providers won't do it and their prem equipment doesn't support it and
the local IT person doesn't have the know-how to do it. I know that
the typical NANOG member isn't in this category, but this is a
use-case that is very common and outnumbers NANOG members.
Sign up for my new class "Advanced Time Mgmt: Team Efficiency" at PICC!
April 29-30, New Jersey, LOPSA PICC: www.picconf.org
"Call for papers and talk proposals" open at LISA! Write your paper today!
Dec 4-9, Boston, Usenix LISA, www.usenix.org/event/lisa11
Re: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites Job Snijders (Apr 08)