Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:45:49 +0200

Be careful what you wish for:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-aplusp>


On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org> wrote:
I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
155.229.10.20:1024-2047.  Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP.   :)

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com> wrote:

On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, GP Wooden wrote:

 I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...


I'm not sure about that, but we know that, if a Sullenberger unit has been
installed, a large aircraft can survive a DoS attack perpetrated by the
avian carrier.

--
Brandon Ross                                              AIM:
 BrandonNRoss
                                                              ICQ:  2269442
                                  Skype:  brandonross  Yahoo:  BrandonNRoss





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]