mailing list archives
Re: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative?
From: Mike Gatti <ekim.ittag () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:34:25 -0400
Not an appliance but a really amazing job at stopping spam, www.messagelabs.com (purchased by Symantec). We went from
messagelabs service to barracuda appliance and the difference is astronomical, whereas before i might get one or two
spams a day using MessageLabs now with the barracuda I get an average of 25 to 30.
ekim.ittag () gmail com
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:51 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
OK, its been a year since my Barracuda subscription expired. The unit still stops some spam. I figured that I would
go and see what they would do if I tried to renew my subscription EXACTLY one year after it expired. Would their
renewal website say "Oh, you are at your anniversary date", and renew me for a year?
No such luck: They want me to PAY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR for which I did NOT receive service and then for the current
(upcoming year). Sorry - I don't allow myself to be ripped off like that. Sorry Barracuda - you get no money from me
and I'll tell everyone I know about this policy of yours.
I posted an article about this unscrupulous practice on my blog last year at
My question is - does anyone have any suggestions for another e-mail appliance like the Barracuda Spam Firewall that
doesn't try to charge their customers for time not used. I should be able to shut off the unit for a year or whatever
and simply renew from the point that I re-activate the unit instead of having to pay for back-years that I didn't use.