Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:27:23 -0700


On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:


On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:

I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.  So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does 
that count as packet loss or tunneling?

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/


I was disappointed in this RFC -- Section 3.1 didn't include the proper discussion of the difference between African 
and European avian carriers, and we know what happens if that question is asked at the wrong time.



              --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb





That applies to swallows. I'm not sure pidgeons pose the same issue. I think in general, swallows
provide poor platforms for avian transport of IP datagrams.


Owen




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]