mailing list archives
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:57:17 -0400
On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Which? African or European Swallows?
(Watches Chad fly over the cliff edge) ;-)
So the RFC needed more text in it's Security Considerations section, too...
On Apr 1, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Chad Dailey wrote:
Swallows have MTU issues.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram
does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
I was disappointed in this RFC -- Section 3.1 didn't include the proper discussion of the difference between
African and European avian carriers, and we know what happens if that question is asked at the wrong time.
--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
That applies to swallows. I'm not sure pidgeons pose the same issue. I think in general, swallows
provide poor platforms for avian transport of IP datagrams.
Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)