Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 05:19:20 +0200

Isn't that what the uvula is for?

Oh...   never mind....   wrong swallow.   ;)

On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote:
Swallows have MTU issues.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:

On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:

I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.  So
if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or

I was disappointed in this RFC -- Section 3.1 didn't include the proper
discussion of the difference between African and European avian carriers,
and we know what happens if that question is asked at the wrong time.

              --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

That applies to swallows. I'm not sure pidgeons pose the same issue. I
think in general, swallows
provide poor platforms for avian transport of IP datagrams.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]