mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address exchange
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:46:49 -0400
On Apr 18, 2011, at 10:35 PM, David Conrad wrote:
To try to bring this back to NANOG (instead of PPML-light), the issue is that since at least two alternative
registries have apparently been established, how are network operators going to deal with the fact that the currently
execrable "whois database" is almost certainly going to get worse?
Does it have to get worse simply because there is change? I see no particular
reason that the Internet number registry system can't evolve into something
with multiple registries including overlapping service regions and competition
if that's what folks actually want. We've seen this in the DNS space and I can't
say that it necessarily worse or better than what resulted from the prior single
However, it's definitely true that what occurred in the DNS space is clearly
documented, has a complete fabric of contractual agreements, and was part of
a multi-year discussion regarding goals of the overall system and various
proposals on how it should best change.
Now, Internet number resources are different in many ways, including the
fact that network operators must have reliable access to the information in
order to keep things running. Registrants may have exclusive use of their
numbers, but the network operators also have a right to know the registration
of any given piece of address space. As you know, multiple IP registries
would definitely pose some coordination challenges in being able to reliably
account for all of the address space at any given moment.
What we lack is any meaningful proposals on how to restructure the Internet
number registry system, including what are the goals of doing such, how are
those goals and the existing requirements are met, and what protections are
needed for integrity of the system. It's possible if this were discussed by
the global community, it might be obvious how to best proceed or not.
Personally, I do not see it as inevitable that "alternative registries" must
have a detrimental impact to the WHOIS database, unless they are introduced
in an uncoordinated manner and without global discussion of the actual goals.