Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 address exchange
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:45:57 -0700


Given ARIN's STLS, it would seem even ARIN has the 'right perspective' to see the "up$ide". It's more about the 
implication of folks having increasing financial incentive to go outside the existing mechanisms (e.g., 
Nortel/Microsoft) and the implications that has on network operations.

Since it would seem we have an impedance mismatch on this topic, I'll not bore NANOG with further discussion.


On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:37 AM, John Curran wrote:

On Apr 19, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how a bunch of different
entities providing fragmented "post-allocation services" is of any

Jeff -

   Imagine for a moment that you had quite a few 
unneeded addresses and the upheaval also meant 
no pesky policy constraints on your monetization efforts -  
would you then view it as having some benefit?  You just 
might not have the right perspective to appreciate the 
potential up$ide...


John Curran
President and CEO

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]