Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 address exchange
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:45:57 -0700

John,

Given ARIN's STLS, it would seem even ARIN has the 'right perspective' to see the "up$ide". It's more about the 
implication of folks having increasing financial incentive to go outside the existing mechanisms (e.g., 
Nortel/Microsoft) and the implications that has on network operations.

Since it would seem we have an impedance mismatch on this topic, I'll not bore NANOG with further discussion.

Regards,
-drc

On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:37 AM, John Curran wrote:

On Apr 19, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how a bunch of different
entities providing fragmented "post-allocation services" is of any
benefit.

Jeff -

   Imagine for a moment that you had quite a few 
unneeded addresses and the upheaval also meant 
no pesky policy constraints on your monetization efforts -  
would you then view it as having some benefit?  You just 
might not have the right perspective to appreciate the 
potential up$ide...

/John 

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]