mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address exchange
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:26:59 -0400
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Benson Schliesser
<bensons () queuefull net> wrote:
Without defining what an optimal cost might be, my comment was intended to show that our current baseline already
results in a surplus.
I don't think the cost of IPv4 addresses has anywhere to go but up.
This mysterious Nortel/Microsoft transaction would seem to give
credibility to an assumption of increasing cost. Therefore, it stands
to reason that the cost of "database services" associated with being a
holder of IP addresses will be inconsequential.
If I wanted to own www.abc.com, I could do that for a pretty low cost
of < $20/year through the various dot-com registries. I am pretty
sure ABC would not sell it to me for any price I could afford. Thus,
the cost of that domain name lies not with the database services but
with the unique string.
If anyone thinks that won't be true for IP addresses, by all means,
let that person propose to overhaul the IN-ADDR system and possibly
the WHOIS database. I do not think stakeholders will agree with their
views. IP addresses are finite, and the cost of acquiring them will,
in all likelihood, dwarf the cost of publishing ownership/custodial
information or operational DNS records.
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Re: IPv4 address exchange David Conrad (Apr 18)
IPv4 address exchange Peter Thimmesch (Apr 20)