mailing list archives
Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:00:53 -0700
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Bhoomi Jain <bhoomij () india com> wrote:
I thank you for asking the advice of the community.
As our colleagues suggest, having 6to4 relays inside the network helps to reduce the latency. Opening up your
generous services to a larger Internet community by advertising the 220.127.116.11/24 BGP prefix outside the network
could have extreme and unintended consequences.
To give you an idea, a lot of the Internet in India depends on the service of the Tata companies, with international
routing coming from Tata Communications AS 6453. Announcing 18.104.22.168/24 to 6453 as a customer, I would worry
about its treatment as BGP best-path, in place of closer 6to4 relays. As you understand, these circuits are very far
away, and also very full. This is not something I would recommend.
On the contrary; I think Comcast announcing their 6to4 relays
through TATA could be just the incentive the Internet needs to
kick the 6to4 habit completely, and decide once and for all
the only sane option is dual-stack native. ;-)
Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Martin Millnert (Apr 20)
RE: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Bhoomi Jain (Apr 20)