Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Bandwidth Growth
From: "Curran, David" <David.Curran () windstream com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:52:29 -0500


Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:36:54 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Subject: Re: Bandwidth growth
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
Message-ID: <20110421023654.GE13776 () skywalker creative net au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If it's a true research project, wouldn't you really be interested in
both
evidence for/against? :-)

Just my 2c here,


Adrian


Touche.  Fortunately not being in the academic world allows me to be
completely biased! :)  But your point is well taken, and I'll take
evidence for either side.  I appreciate all of the responses I've received
thus far.  Especially the links to the IX graphs.  While I agree you can't
account for peering/de-peering, it also strikes me that on the aggregate
the graphs do indeed show a significant increase around the "holidays"
(the US ones anyway).

The LINX, TORIX, and SIX graphs provided earlier, for example, seem
relatively flat until the Nov. timeframe at which point they seem to seek
a new higher "normal".  Could just be my lack of sleep and my biased
opinion though.  As one might infer, I'm trying to find evidence
corroborating my own experiences.  My theory being that all of those cool
Internet connected toys (Blue Ray, TVs, Ipads, etc) that hit the market
this past year have lead to a substantial increase in residential Internet
traffic.  If that were true, I guess I'd expect that enterprise oriented
service providers would not see the same uptick as residential providers.

Thanks again to all have responded (and anyone else that might still).

David

***************************************************************************************
The information contained in this message, including attachments, may contain
privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered only to the
person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, Windstream requests
that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the message or its
attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to anyone else.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]