Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: SIXXS contact
From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:20:19 +0100

On 27 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:

I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists 
(and much of the various software run on/over the internet is written by volunteers, and/or given away for free), we 
aren't going to get there.  The big deafening silence from SIXXS is really unfortunate in that it does actively 
affect my opinion of IPv6, my willingness to spend time implementing it, pestering my upstream about it, or having 
my business give a damn about it.  Yes I know they're volunteers, but how much does that matter?

So you would prefer that they shut down their service rather than provide current level of support?

I've had very prompt and good replies from SixXS when I've contacted them.

Equally students I know who use HE brokers are very happy with their service, e.g. HE have added features in response 
to feedback.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]