Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: FTTH CPE landscape
From: Scott Helms <khelms () ispalliance net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:13:38 -0400


You say waste, I say perfectly valid use.

Its waste to carve out of that many subnets without a good reason (and no the reason presented so far are NOT compelling, IPSEC works perfectly over a bridged interface).

If you're dealing with business customers, then your usage versus wasted
ratio is much higher and less of a concern, but what's the point? Are you
trying to cut down on a large broadcast domain?

Why is it less of a waste to allocate a /30 to a business using a single public
IP than it is to a residence? This makes no sense to me.

I simply prefer the additional troubleshooting and other capabilities given
to me in a routed environment in most cases.
If you want that then you need to run a router not have a /30 routed over your WAN interface. Its far better for your WAN interface to be part of a much larger subnet that we can in turn route a network to.

Owen



--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault