Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue?
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 08:48:14 -0700

This is one of the reasons that I thought a useful output from the opsec or idr working group would be a documented set 
of community functions. Not mapped to values mind you. but I really like to say to providers "do you support rfc blah 
communities" or "what's your rfc blah community mapping" rather than "what communities do you support".



On Aug 7, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said:
I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...

"they don't accept communities"??!? Just... wow. ;)

(That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell
reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part
about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on
your head...)



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]