Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: v4/v6 dns thoughts?
From: "Blake T. Pfankuch" <blake () pfankuch me>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:03:05 +0000

I too agree the v4/v6 stuff is pointless and slightly annoying so I have been using same name with A/AAAA records.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Landon Stewart [mailto:lstewart () superb net] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 6:16 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: v4/v6 dns thoughts?

On 9 August 2011 16:36, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

My PTRs are all to the same host name. In any context where the 
protocol actually matters, you should have other ways to detect it.

I also don't recommend doing the foo.v4/foo.v6 thing in your forwards.
There's
really no advantage to do it. Most tools either have separate 
IPv4/IPv6 variants or have command-line switches for address-family 
control if you care.


I agree that using the v4 or v6 tag in forward or reverse is pointless.  One can tell it is v4 or v6 by the result of 
the lookup and the hostnames don't change just because they are accessible via IPv6.  If a hostname is directly related 
to the fact that its IPv6 by all means put it in there though.


--
Landon Stewart <LStewart () SUPERB NET>
SuperbHosting.Net by Superb Internet Corp.
Toll Free (US/Canada): 888-354-6128 x 4199
Direct: 206-438-5879
Web hosting and more "Ahead of the Rest": http://www.superbhosting.net


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]