Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 end user addressing
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:00:05 -0700

On Aug 10, 2011 7:45 PM, "Mark Newton" <newton () internode com au> wrote:


On 11/08/2011, at 8:42 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:

I suppose that limiting enough households to too small an allocation
will have that effect. I would rather we steer the internet deployment
towards liberal enough allocations to avoid such disability for the
future.


I see the lack of agreement on whether /48 or /56 or /60 is good for a
home network to be a positive thing.

As long as there's no firm consensus, router vendors will have to
implement
features which don't make silly hard-coded assumptions.

Innovation will still happen, features will still be implemented, we'll
still climb out of the NAT morass.  But we'll do it with CPE that allows
for
a richer spectrum of variation than we would if we just said, "Dammit, /48
for
everyone."

It's all good.  At this stage of the game, any amount of "moving forward"
is
better than staying where we are.

(which reminds me: http://www.internode.on.net/news/2011/08/238.php It
ain't
that hard)


Finally a useful post in this thread.  Good work on the deployment of real
ipv6!

Cb

 - mark

--
Mark Newton                               Email:  newton () internode com au(W)
Network Engineer                          Email:  newton () atdot dotat org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd                         Desk:   +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223








  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]