Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: v4/v6 dns thoughts?
From: Andrew Parnell <andrew () parnell ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:01:15 -0400

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

I also don't recommend doing the foo.v4/foo.v6 thing in your forwards. There's
really no advantage to do it. Most tools either have separate IPv4/IPv6 variants
or have command-line switches for address-family control if you care.

For most tools that I ordinarily use, I would certainly agree with
this.  The only exception might be from a web browser; while there are
ways that they can be reconfigured to only use certain IP versions in
certain cases, it is probably more straightforward to use
www.ipvN.domain.tld or a similar name.

For reverse DNS, I completely agree that there is no reason to use a
different name.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]