Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Experience with Juniper MX-80s
From: Mark Meijerink <Mark.Meijerink () vancis nl>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:08:53 +0000

Babak,

For one of our customers we run two MX-80's. Both with two full routing peers plus a lot of other smaller BGP peerings 
at a local IX. So far no strange behaviour or poor performance. Peerings are all IPv4 and IPv6. I don't know if you 
would need specific features but for the basic border router functionality it seems to perform as expected.


Regards,
 Mark
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Babak Pasdar [mailto:bpasdar () batblue com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:44 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Experience with Juniper MX-80s

Hello NANOG Group,

I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with Juniper MX-80s.  Our recent experience with 
Juniper has not been great both in terms of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the recent revs of Junos 
for the MX platform.  I want to know if the MX-80 functions as advertised and in specific can properly handle two full 
IPv4 and IPv6 BGP feeds 

Thanks in advance,

Babak 

--
Babak Pasdar
President & CEO | Certified Ethical Hacker
Bat Blue Corporation | Integrity . Privacy . Availability . Performance
(p) 212.461.3322 x3005 | (f) 212.584.9999 | (w) www.BatBlue.com

Bat Blue is proud to be the Official WiFi Provider for ESPN's X Games

Bat Blue's AS: 25885 | BGP Policy | Peering Policy

Receive Bat Blue's Daily Security Intelligence Report

Bat Blue's Legal Notice


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault