mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:39:04 -0700
On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
vulnerable to attacks.
how about simpler and more stable?
not rooted to a particular area.
supports more than one AFI at the same time
isn't dependent on ip addressing to form an adjacency
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Aug 11)
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Joel Jaeggli (Aug 12)
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jason Duerstock (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS, (continued)