Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

IPv6 Real World Maturity (was re: How long is your rack?)
From: Tim Wilde <twilde () cymru com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:43:44 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6 
threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over
again? :)

Yes, they prove that IPv6 is not a viable technology as it currently
stands and we should be working on the next big thing, of course!
IPv42, here I come!

On a serious note, though, really, what DOES it say about the real-world
maturity / actual chances of adoption for IPv6 that Charles' statement
above is, in fact, true?  Not trying to be anti-IPv6 or start a flamewar
(well, okay, I am trying to start a flamewar, that's what Sunday nights
are for :)), it's honestly something that puzzles me.  It just doesn't
feel right...

Regards,
Tim

- -- 
Tim Wilde, Senior Software Engineer, Team Cymru, Inc.
twilde () cymru com | +1-630-230-5433 | http://www.team-cymru.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAk5Ia8AACgkQluRbRini9thKyACfZ6H6m0GQRLm6SWCOGZ663j/G
5+kAn0JM74VwRkCeaBhaTRYEY3Hz7oK1
=h5jP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]