Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Exploiting a non-facilities CLEC relationship
From: Charles N Wyble <charles () knownelement com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:08:09 -0500

On 08/15/2011 10:14 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Graham Wooden wrote:
If I understand your question, yes.  We did this some time ago.  Colo
in various ILEC and CLEC central offices, 

Um. Doesn't colo in various ILEC/CLEC CO == facilities based CLEC?

order T1 loops (but it's only half a loop...from customer to CO), so
you're saving there, and because you're ordering it as a CLEC, most
people would be shocked how cheap a T1 can be. Connect the various
colos together with a network of T1's and T3's (especially if you can
establish a relationship with a carrier who's on-net in all or most of
the COs you want to be in), and you're set.

Interesting. Can't you just ride the existing network between the CO
locations? For a fee of course, but I would think it could be all
ethernet based and just pay per mb or something?



Someone looking to start this model now, I'd say is about 10 years
late, 5 years too late.

Yeah. Building ones own network is a bit... difficult. At least to serve
on a competitive basis. 


-- 
Charles N Wyble charles () knownelement com @charlesnw on twitter

http://blog.knownelement.com

Building alternative,global scale,secure, cost effective bit moving platform
for tomorrows alternate default free zone.



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]