Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Exploiting a non-facilities CLEC relationship
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:56:01 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Charles N Wyble wrote:

On 08/15/2011 10:14 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Graham Wooden wrote:
If I understand your question, yes.  We did this some time ago.  Colo
in various ILEC and CLEC central offices,

Um. Doesn't colo in various ILEC/CLEC CO == facilities based CLEC?

That depends on your definition of "facilities based". As a CLEC, we still depended entirely on the ILEC for T1 loops (installation, troubleshooting/repair, etc.).

Interesting. Can't you just ride the existing network between the CO
locations? For a fee of course, but I would think it could be all
ethernet based and just pay per mb or something?

Not if they're different ILECs / different LATAs. If you're in an AT&T CO in city A, and a Centurylink CO in city B, and an AT&T CO in city C, you're going to need a 3rd party, preferably with their own fiber, to connect all the POPs together or back to some central hub site where you have your internet connectivity.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault