Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin () law miami edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:47:39 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:

[...]
No, my point is that if you use RFC-4193, there's not really much benefit
from altering the prefix, so, nobody gets penalized and you can still have
static addresses.
[...]

If anyone is aware of any other widely-used applications in home/office computing, or apps or devices in mobile telecoms, that use RFC-4193 *by default* I would be very interested to learn about them for a paper I am working on.

--
A. Michael Froomkin, http://www.law.tm Blog: http://www.discourse.net
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
Editor, Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots),  jotwell.com
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |    +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  froomkin () law tm
                       -->It's hot here.<--


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]