Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:56:35 -0400

On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:10 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
Next time Cogent de-peers someone, customers do not care who was being
more reasonable.  They care that their links are broken.

Wouldn't that mostly affect people who are silly enough to single-home to a Tier-1 that
gets involved in a peering dispute?

Which $PROBLEM does not affect only those who are "silly enough" to not put mitigation tools for $PROBLEM?

And the customers still don't care.  They just care _that_ it affected them - at least during the problem.  Although 
one can hope they care enough to change their behavior afterward.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]