Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 22:45:03 +0800

On Friday, December 09, 2011 08:57:39 PM Jen Linkova wrote:

on second thought - why are they using link-local as the
next-hop in the first place if the eBGP session is
established over GUA?

This topic was heavily discussed on 'ipv6-ops' back in 
February. You may take a look here for all the details on 
this:

http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2011-
February/004887.html

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]