Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Mark Blackman <mark () exonetric com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 21:11:32 +0000

On 9 Dec 2011, at 21:05, Benson Schliesser <bensons () queuefull net> wrote:

On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
We're going to be hearing a lot more of these. It's the nature of finite resources, and of human nature when faced 
with them. At some point, this will find its way into courtrooms under the rubric of a barrier to entry. It 
already has in terms of antitrust when a company wanted to move its PA prefix to different upstream.

I've had transit service pulled, so the provider can reclaim the /21 that was bundled with the transit.

I'm sorry to hear about that...  Do you know why they reclaimed the block?  E.g. was it used to support a "higher 
margin" service for another customer?


Leased line customers.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]