Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:12:21 -0500

On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:47:06 CST, Benson Schliesser said:

+1 to Fred's comments.  Hopefully, the existence of an open IPv4 address
market will help avoid some of the worst.  (At least for a while, until
the rising prices get too high for a competitive environment.  And maybe
by then the price of IPv4 addresses will have made IPv6 deployment a
much more obvious choice to reluctant CFO-types.)

I suspect the opposite is in fact true - if there is an open market, many sites
will continue deluding themselves and make the end game that much more painful.
If you haven't been able to sell the CFO types on the need to deploy IPv6 *yet*
(consider that you *should* have been specifying "Ipv6-ready" on capex for at
least 4-5 years already, so most of the gear on the floor should be ready to
go), you're going to be *screwed* when you finally get moving.  Among other
things, all the *good* IPv6 experts will already have found good gigs, and it's
gonna either take a bigger paycheck to headhunt one, or you'll be stuck with
the dregs of the market (either way, it will cost you more).

Attachment: _bin

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]