Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:02:14 +0800

On Monday, December 12, 2011 05:17:08 PM Vitkovsky, Adam 

However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP
that can't run their business the way they would like
Maybe they'd like to build an mpls core which right now
is not possible with only ipv6 at hand I'd like to see
the business model to build an mpls network with all the
features we're used to -but solely on ipv6 -I guess the
plan would be let's wait a couple years till it gets
implemented and mature enough

I've been pushing Cisco and Juniper since 2007 for LDPv6 and 
RSVPv6 since 2007. I kept getting non-commital "end of this 
year, end of this year".

After catching up with Cisco during an update of the ASR9000 
a couple of weeks back, I'm meant to understand support will 
be coming around Q1'13 on this platform (which, by 
association, might mean other IOS XR platforms like the 
CRS). It's not clear about other Cisco systems, but I'll be 
pleasantly surprised if they maintain the time lines.

All this despite the fact that drafts have been out for 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]