mailing list archives
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:06:06 +0800
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 02:36:49 PM Don Gould wrote:
I've been researching solutions with NAT and double NAT
in mind because it's obvious that v4 space is going to
become a growing problem.
We've started playing with Stateful NAT64 on a couple of
In general, it works okay, save for issues with applications
that have no IPv6 support, e.g., Skype, e.t.c. We hope to
find more issues as more customers sign up to be guinea
The only thing that is really clear is the lack of
Indeed. We're doing what we can to be part of the solution,
by picking technologies we think will be useful for us and
going out and testing them at scale, with a goal to start
rolling out v6 in droves as well provide usable operator
feedback re: our deployment to vendors and other operators
As much as we'd like to see how the market unravels re: v4,
e.t.c., the fact remains that v6 is the inevitable solution.
So best to get cracking now with real deployments.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Sad IPv4 story? John Curran (Dec 11)
Re: Sad IPv4 story? Don Gould (Dec 14)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 14)