Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:01:06 +0530

Wonderful.  I would urge SPs based stateside to strongly consider
endorsing the MAAWG comments.

thanks
suresh

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, O'Reirdan, Michael
<Michael_OReirdan () cable comcast com> wrote:
MAAWG has written voicing its concerns on SOPA and PIPA.

http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_US_Congress_S968-HR3261_Comments_2011-12.pdf

Mike
________________________________________
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [ops.lists () gmail com]
Sent: 14 December 2011 05:12
To: Hal Murray
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship

I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal
departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others.

If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with
something, other operators could sign on to that as well.

The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less content than
would be entirely productive in a policy discussion.

--srs


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray () megapathdsl net> wrote:

 Security and Other Technical Concerns Raised by the
   DNS Filtering Requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill
 Authors:
   Steve Crocker, Shinkuro, Inc.
   David Dagon, Georgia Tech
   Dan Kaminsky, DKH
   Danny McPherson, Verisign, Inc.
   Paul Vixie, Internet Systems Consortium



--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)




-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault