Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: local_preference for transit traffic?
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:35:55 -0500

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Keegan Holley
<keegan.holley () sungard com> wrote:
I always assumed that taking in more traffic was a bad thing.  I've heard
about one sided peering agreements where one side is sending more traffic
than the other needs them to transport. Am I missing something?  Would this
cause a shift in their favor allowing them to offload more customer traffic
to their peers without complaint?

Well, if Level3 wanted less ingress traffic, they would probably stop
this practice.  I would imagine they thought about it carefully.

-- 
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Sr Network Operator  /  Innovative Network Concepts


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault