Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Don Gould <don () bowenvale co nz>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:44:36 +1300

On 20/12/2011 8:31 p.m., Owen DeLong wrote:

Ideally, the IETF should provide complete solutions based on DHCPv6 and
on RA and let the operators decide what they want to use in their environments.


I would like to see a simple presentation of the different ways of setting up a small network at the edge with the features, benefits and issues, of each method.

My interest is in networks with 2 to 20 devices in them. ie, small business and home.

I would also like to see a survey of how people are setting up their small networks. While some are interested in the purest way of setting them up, I'm not. I'm interested in how people are setting them up. When setting up networks for customers, I'm interested in doing it in the most common way.

What I don't want is to end up with a bad name because I set up stuff 'the right way' but in such a way that the next tech the customer calls gets annoyed that what I've done is so complex that it will cost the customer $$$$$ to fix a fault.

I'm sure these comments have been made by others in the past, I'm just adding a voice.


Don Gould
31 Acheson Ave
Christchurch, New Zealand
Ph: + 64 3 348 7235
Mobile: + 64 21 114 0699

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]