Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:09:01 +0900

TJ wrote:

I  think perhaps you are confusing "what must be supported by
implementations" (and ignoring the text describing the requirements) as
stated in 6434, with operational usage.

There is not much difference.

For example - SLAAC must be supported by the implementations, but an
environment isn't required to use it.

Still, if ND, which SHOULD be implemented, is not implemented,
SLAAC CAN NOT be implemented.

And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.

                                                Masataka Ohta


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]