Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Mark Radabaugh <mark () amplex net>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 13:23:46 -0500

On 12/26/11 12:56 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta<mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>:
And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
By who?  Sources please.
A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of RA.
Especially when some of the biggest IPv6 networks out there are still using
it pretty heavily.

(C''mon you guys, *deploy* already.  It's pretty sad when people are arguing
about stuff like this, and a frikkin' cow college out in the boonies pushing
300-400mbits/sec of IPv6 off-campus is still a "large" deployment. It's
embarassing for the industry as a whole)


Find me some decent consumer CPE and I would be more than happy to deploy IPv6. So far the choices I have found for consumer routers are pathetic. A fair number of them still have IPv4 issues.

--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex

mark () amplex net  419.837.5015



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]