Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:11:43 +0900

Ray Soucy wrote:

After reading some of your work on end-to-end multihoming, I think I
understand some of what you're trying to say.  My problem is that
while you seem to have a very strong academic understanding of
networking, you seem to be ignoring operational realities in
implementation.

To your surprise, my opinion is partially based on my
experience about 10 years ago as a CTO of a commercial
ISP, which offered secure public WLAN service with IP
moblity.

Security and mobility stacks were implemented on BSD and
Windows.

We successfully performed smooth handover experiment at a
racing circuit with a car moving at 260km/h.

        http://www.root-hq.com/newsrelease/news030513.html
        (in Japanese)

which is why I know delay caused by SLAAC is annoying.

Though no commercial IPv6 service was offered, we received
government funding and implemented end to end multihoming
with mobility over IPv6 without ND. Public trial was offered:

        http://www.root-hq.com/e/newsrelease/pressrels0218.html
        (in English)

                                                Masataka Ohta


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]