mailing list archives
Re: IPTV and ASM
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:15:16 +0800
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 06:19:14 AM Mike McBride
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers,
that non igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with
IPTV. Versus other reasons such as reducing state. Or is
this a non issue and everyone is using SSM with IPTV?
We are running NG-MVPN (BGP replaces PIM, MPLS replaces
We run PIM-SM, not only because our customer's STB's only
support IGMPv2 (we only transport IPTv content, not generate
it), but also because, well, it just works and there hasn't
been any compelling need to push for PIM-SSM.
It's scaling well due to the nature of the NG-MVPN
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: IPTV and ASM Antonio Querubin (Dec 29)
Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)