Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:39:27 +0800

On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:10:15 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

Of course this isn't strictly true,...

Of course, not "strictly". 

What I meant was the CRS and ASR9000 don't operate like the 
6500/7600 and other Cisco switches that punted packets to 
CPU if, for one reason or another, a bug or misconfiguration 
caused said packets to be sent to the CPU for forwarding.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]