mailing list archives
Re: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:39:27 +0800
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:10:15 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
Of course this isn't strictly true,...
Of course, not "strictly".
What I meant was the CRS and ASR9000 don't operate like the
6500/7600 and other Cisco switches that punted packets to
CPU if, for one reason or another, a bug or misconfiguration
caused said packets to be sent to the CPU for forwarding.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6? Kevin Loch (Dec 29)