Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes () mwdh2o com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:06:51 -0800

If I am not mistaken the IETF efforts to standardize the TRILL spec, and IEEE efforts to standardize the DCB spec will 
provide the desired features to Ethernet: lossless delivery, QoS, and bringing an IS-IS layer 3 model to layer 2. I 
think Cisco has a pre TRILL/DCB standards feature set called Fabricpath, and Brocade has a feature set called VCS.

Both, I think, will converge Ethernet data and Fibre Channel over the same wire.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Hill [mailto:tom () ninjabadger net]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:58 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!

Pfft. Everyone knows that Fibre Channel's going to replace everything...
The minute we get those 128Gbit/sec transmission characteristics,
Ethernet's gonna be as good as RS-485.

This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded 
links, from your system.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]