mailing list archives
Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:17:35 -0800
On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
... host systems should participate in IGP
We tried that.
It didn't scale well.
The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
-did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was buried before it could be widely
deployed, I was not around back than but would like to know why ES-IS did not scale well when integrated IS-IS is
still used primarily for great scalability
CLNS carried NSAPs, not IP addresses.
ES-IS was the protocol between hosts and routers, very much akin to ARP. IS-IS was the IGP used for CLNS. Yes, it's
the same one that we use today for IP. Even in the ISO model, hosts did not participate in IS-IS.
There was no particular scalability problem with ES-IS, other than the mcast burden that it imposed on the link layer.
This is not radically different than the burden that ARP broadcasts require. Limit your broadcast domains.