Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:10:03 +0900

Steven Bellovin wrote:

Considering that the reason to have multiple routers
should be for redundancy, there is no point to use
one of them as the default router.

VRRP?  The Router Discovery Protocol (RFC 1256).  But given
how much more reliable routers are today than in 1984, I'm
not convinced it's that necessary these days.

How much, do you think, more reliability required to the
Internet today than in 1984?

There was a lot less understanding of the difference between hosts
and routers in 1984 than there is today -- if nothing else, note
how 4.2BSD and 4.3BSD considered all multihomed machines to be
routers.

Unlike routers, multihomed machines without forwarding should
listen IGP but must not advertise routes, which was well
understood very well even at that time.

It is the right thing to do, as is proven by the 99.8%
argument that Microsoft don't do so. :-)

                                        Masataka Ohta


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]