Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Tony Varriale <tvarriale () comcast net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:58:16 -0600

On 12/29/2011 9:06 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
(you forgot to change subj:)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrne<cb.list6 () gmail com>  wrote:
Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support
mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!

(Happy new year almost)

I just came up with a new way implement ATM on the LAN so we can all get along. It's called LANE. Oh wait...


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]